Dal Khalsa UK

Dal Khalsa UK

Dal Khalsa UK's Official Facebook Page Join Now!

Dal Khalsa UK on Facebook

Monday, 11 January 2010

Dal Khalsa UK Supports Sonia Deol - Jaswinder Kaur On Her Sikh 1984 Journey

Dal Khalsa UK extends support to Sonia Deol - Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu on her Sikh 1984 Journey and does not hold her responsible for the inaccurate portrayal of
Shaheed Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale



Dal Khalsa UK extends support to Sonia Deol - Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu for her hard work and efforts in covering the issues of 1984 in the programme

called ' 1984 A Sikh Story’, which was aired on BBC 1 on Sunday the 10th of January 2010.

As we all know 1984 was the year of the Sikh Genocide carried out by the Indian Government and its ruthless terrorist military & government forces on the Sikh Nation to strike a blow at the self confidence of the Sikhs.Starting with the sealing off of Panjab the Sikh Homeland a media and telecommunications blackout to the Military assault on Sri Harmandar Sahib,Sri Akal Takht & 42 other Sikh Gurdwareh across Panjab,to the pre planned Delhi Genocide carried out by state sponsored Hindu extremist mobs and Government forces - which spread across India after the elimination of Indira Gandhi by Shaheed Satwant Singh & Shaheed Beant Singh.

The programme was watched by Sikhs and non Sikhs of all ages across the UK ,a special interest was taken by Sikh Youths in the UK as can be seen from the numerous text messages and facebook messages everyone received regarding the programme.

While the programme had positive aspects such as the segment on the Delhi Genocide it showed Shaheed Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale as a terrorist who was out of control.

We understand this was Jaswinder's personal journey on her discovery of the events of 1984 and DO NOT HOLD HER RESPONSIBLE for the inaccuracies in the programme such as the bad portrayal of Sant Bhindranwale to the reasons of the why the Sikhs were demanding more rights and why Harmandar Sahib was fortified.

We ask all people to stop their attacks on Jaswinder on the basis of her being the presenter ,it is the likes of Mark Tully and others such as the background researchers of the programme who are responsible for the inaccuracies.We understand the Sikh Nation is pained and hurt just like we are about the negative aspects of the programme but we will not tolerate attacks on Jaswinder who herself is a Sikh and has just started to look in to the events of 1984.Instead it is our duty as Sikhs to make sure the truth comes out about Sant Bhindranwale and other issues which were not covered or were inaccurate in the programme.

The programme started with Jaswinder exploring who Shaheed Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was ,she travelled to the Damdami Taksal where Sant Ji studied and got the views of the current students and teachers who were all in support of Sant Bhindranwale and saw him as an icon.The murder of Lala Jagat Narayan newspaper editor is then mentioned and how Sant Bhindranwale was arrested and then released without charge,no mention is made of the anti Sikh writing he(Lala Jagat Naryan) had made in his Newspaper such as 'Kach Kara Kirpan Ehnko Bhejo Pakistan' or his writings against the Sikh Gurus which angered the Sikhs & his support for Shiv Sena a right wing anti Sikh group.

Mark Tully a veteran BBC journalist then appeared with various inaccurate facts about Sant Bhindranwale from calling him a 'fanatical religious leader' which he was 'scared' of to describing him as an agent of the Congress Party & Sanjay Gandhi he claimed the Congress in effect told Sant Bhindranwale 'You come with us and we will make you ruler of Panjab'.This is factually incorrect neither was Sant Bhindranwale an agent of the Congress and nor did he have any Political links or aspirations for them or even himself - he mentions this himself in numerous video recordings which can be seen on Youtube.On the issue of Mark Tully being 'scared' of Sant Ji and Sant Ji 'looking' at him in a previous interview he said Shaheed General Subegh Singh looked at him this video can also be seen online,one questions the credibility of this story.

The second claim Mark Tully made was that the reason Sant Ji became anti Government was due to the reason that his 'Sermons' were burned,this is also untrue as his 'Sermons' were not burned but Saroops of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj and Gutkeh were burned in a bus belonging to his Jatha by the Police.Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is the living Guru of the Sikhs and not a 'Sermon' which Sant Bhindranwale's secretary 'wrote' down as Tully claimed.

It is then mentioned that Sikhs hijacked buses and shot dead Hindus ,it is well documented that the Indian Intelligence services had criminals released from Jails and their agents dressed up as Sikhs and used to carry out random attacks on the public especially Hindus to stir up violence and decrease support for the Sant Bhindranwale and the Dharam Yudh Morcha.Julio Ribero Director General of the Panjab Police even admits to having a group called the '3rd agency' which carried these attacks out in his book 'Bullet for Bullet',they saw these attacks as vital to destroying any Sikh unrest or Civil rights movement.

The programme then talks about how Rajiv Gandhi wanted Sant Bhindranwale out of the Harmandar Sahib Complex and that Sant Bhindranwale was out of control as he had arms inside and was fortifying the complex.

The reason for fortifying the Harmandar Sahib Complex was due to the information that had come to light at that time to Sant Bhindranwale that a replica had been built of the Harmandar Sahib Complex in a remote secret location near the Doon Valley,S.K Sinha the General 1st chosen to lead Bluestar confirms this ,as Sinha refused to follow orders he was thrown out and replaced with A.S Vadiya alongside
Kuldeep Brar.

Due to this information Sant Bhindranwale fortified the complex as he and his close associates knew about an impending attack he openly speaks about this in video recordings.Another reason for having arms and being 'defensive' was that Sikhs were being harassed and attacked daily along with women being raped by Government forces and their criminal agencies, Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroops were being burned and Sikhs were being murdered all over the place.As the Government was the ones organising and carrying out the attacks Sikhs had no choice but to be armed at the time - and this is recognised by the UN and International law.

On the 1st of June 1981 Bhai Mengha Singh Ji Babbar was shot down by a sniper of the CRPF and Indian Paramilitary forces,even then the Sikhs managed to hold back.Panjab was then cut off from the World all telecommunications and electric and water soon after,as Panjab was sealed the gathering Indian army of over 100,000 across Panjab with more arriving began to prepare for Operation Bluestar.

On June 3rd the Operation was launched - to cause maximum damage on the same day as the
Shaheedi martyrdom of the founder of the Golden Temple,
Sirtaj Shaheedan Deh Guru Arjan Dev Ji Maharaj.No warning was given to the thousands of pilgrims as has been confirmed time after time and even by Jaswinder herself in the programme.All parts of the army were used from the airforce launching attacks from above to the navy - divers in the amrit sarovar surronding the Harmandar Sahib itself not only this the BSF - Border Security Force CRPF - Central Reserve Police Force and Special Forces - Black Cat Commandos were also called in on top of the army.

The Sikhs anticipating the attacks had already been prepared before hand as they had heard about the replica of Harmandar Sahib that the army had built around 2 years before to practice the attack on.Through the efforts of Shaheed General Subegh Singh - an ex Decorated
Army General who after seeing the injustice joined the Sikh Civil Rights movement and then Sant Bhindranwale ,the Harmandar Sahib Complex was fortified as much as it could to protect against an attack by the Indian Army.

The Tanks which rolled on to the Parkarama were already there outside the complex in and around Jallianwala Bagh they were not 'specially' called in, one can see this in pictures on sites like neverforget84.com and others.

It is then said that an armoured personnel carrier was blown up and tanks were ordered in , one asks what were tanks doing alongside hundreds of thousands of Military and Indian Forces to supposedly get one man?If they really wanted Sant Bhindranwale could they not have easily snipred him like they did to Shaheed Bhai Mengha Singh Ji Babbar on June 1st?

Pictures from Operation Bluestar also confirm that Chemical Gases were used which are illegal under international law ,gas masks can be seen on the armies faces as they smile over the bodies of innocent pilgrims and Sikhs.

It is then said Sant Bhindranwale was shot as he and other Sikhs ran from Sri Akal Takht Sahib ,this is very untrue fact and whoever researched this fact has deeply offended the Sikh Community ,similar claims have been made over the years by Indian officials
but all are untrue.

Why would Sant Bhindranwale hold out till the last minute and then run when there is no way out?He took an oath to defend Sri Harmandar Sahib and Sri Akal Takht Sahib until his last breath ,an oath on Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj - all Sikhs know for a fact that he did not run and nor did any of the 150 - 200 Sikh Warriors alongside him ,most were killed by chemical gas,bullets or tank shells.Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale gave his Shaheedi on June 6th 1984 fighting till his last breath alongside the Sikhs with him to defend the Sikhs' holiest shrine and honour of the Sikh Nation - for which he gave his life for and became Shaheed,our supreme authority Sri Akal Takht Sahib which all Sikhs are to abide by accepts him as a Shaheed Martyr and a Sikh Saint Solider.Alongside gross Human rights abuses and rape torture was also carried out like on the dead body of Shaheed General Subegh Singh his head was scalped and barbed wire and iron rods put through his body - this is just one example of torture which can be seen from pictures on Bluestar - they didn't even leave dead bodies.

Then the government estimates of casualties are given these are known to be greatly inaccurate and infact thousands of Sikhs lay dead.Jaswinder is clearly very upset when talking about the figures of dead and it is clear that the number did go in to the thousands.A snippet of an Indian Propaganda video was given to news agencies after Bluestar is then shown and Brar claimed weapons had come from Pakistan & China to the Sikhs.One has to look at footage from the BBC and ITN to see that the Sikhs weapons were limited in number and were not very modern most were post world war 2 and village rifles and shotguns.These weapons were planted in the Harmandar Sahib Complex by the Indian army as eye witnesses saw including Ex Jathedar of Sri Akal Takht Sahib Joginder Singh Vedanti.

He says 'Three army trucks rolled in full of ammunition, including rifles, swords and even spears. All these weapons were taken to Akal Takht Sahib. These were the weapons that were later shown to the people during various photo-ops. '

source: http://worldsikhnews.com/10%20June%202009/Eye%20Witness.htm

This clearly shows that the Indian Government wanted to defame Sikhs across India and the World and link them with Pakistan so they are seen as the enemies of India.Sikh armymen were ordered to clear up the blood and dead bodies to make it look like the attack was justified, Vaidya and Brar had no shame that their armies had urinated in the sarovar,smoked & drank ,raped women,blown up kids using tanks,shot sikhs dead at point blank range after tying their hands with their turbans.Nor did they have any shame that Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji the living Guru of Sikhs was shot with bullets - and all this in the Sikhs' holiest shrine.

No mention is made of the Sikh Reference library being burned down which contained the the original writings of the Gurus and historical artifacts from Sikh History.

Then pilgrims caught up are interviewed who describe how the army lobbed grenades and how their families were blown to bits in the hotels surrounding the complex.Jaswinder then asks was there any warning? the pilgrims say no ,then Jaswinder asks that General Brar said he gave a warning - the pilgrims say no,this helps further on in the programme when Brar is interviewed.

Jaswinder than interviews General Brar at a secret location ,only Jaswinder knows what emotions ran through her standing face to face with the man who took charge of and part in most the horrific attack on Sikhism's holiest shrine.It must have been a very difficult time for her and one can see the emotion on Jaswinder's face as she asks questions to Brar.

On why the attack took place on the Gurpurb - Shaheedi Divas of Guru Arjan Dev Ji when the complex was full of pilgrims ,Brar claims the orders were to go in as soon as possible.This cannot be true as they had planned for this attack around 2 years before on the replica of the complex as confirmed by General S.K Sinha, we believe this date was chosen on purpose to cause maximum casualties and damage.

Brar claims it was not about religious sentiments and that they let pilgirms out which is not true it also does not explain why the Army surrounded 42 other Gurdwareh including the birth place of the Khalsa Sri Anandpur Sahib and Damdama Sahib was Bhindranwale there as well? Jaswinder then goes on to say 'What about the eye witnesses who said they did not hear any of the announcements ?'
Brar replies in a blatant lie ' Thats not true.. thats not true..I mean there were loudspeakers blaring away all the time..the fact is it is very difficult to distinguish in the night who is a civilian and who is a militant the firing is coming and the firing is being returned and in cross fire some civilians die and some militants die its not easy to differentiate'.
Jaswinder then asks 'Why go in when you know there are pilgirms inside?'
Brar replies 'How long do you wait,you wait till the next day we won't be able to go in'
Jaswinder then says 'Where could Bhindranwale have gone if you had pretty much the whole place surrounded?'
Brar then says 'Oh no it was not a question about having the whole place surrounded..we would get surrounded in the next 24 hours..after all how long can you keep this away from travelling to the mainland of Panjab? you'd have a thousands of millions of Sikhs with spears guns everything rushing to Amritsar and that would be a very sad situation for a man in uniform'
Jaswinder then says 'So you went in at that point for the safety of your own army ?'
Brar replied 'Not only the safety of our own army we had to accomplish the task if we don't go in.. forget the safety of the army the task isn't going to get accomplished'
Jaswinder then asks 'What about your decision to make moral decisions ?this is the holiest..this is the centre of the Sikh faith'
sarcastically Brar replies 'Oh im very sad to tell you that it was no longer holy,so if you're saying that morally we should have thought differently,what about those people inside?was there any sanctity left inside the Golden Temple?where is the morality of the people who were building bunkers there and storing ammunition?im sorry I have to disagree with you'

Brar's justification of attacking on the Gurpurb day falls flat on its face he claims that all the Sikhs of Panjab would have rushed to Amritsar and his army would have been in danger,this is an army which is supposed to defend India's borders so why would Sikhs with 'Spears and Guns' as he put it be a threat to the Indian Army?

Brar and the Indian army lacks morality himself as can be seen from his sarcastic replies,the only reason the complex was fortified was due to knowledge of an impending attack by the Army.

He is then asked what he thinks of those who see Sant Bhindranwale as a Saint and not a terrorist Brar replies ' He may have started out as a saint but he didn't end as a saint let me tell you that,there was nothing saintliness about him at the time of Operation Bluestar'

A clip is then shown of the Indian Propaganda video showing so called weapons from Pakistan and China then the destroyed Sri Akal Takht Sahib and a picture of a saroop of Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj with a bullet inside it after being shot.After being questioned did he accept any responsibility for the damage done? Brar says the responsibility is collective and claims the army held back and the damage could have been more 'severe'- what more 'severe' damage do you need with thousands dead,Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop shot at Sri Akal Takht Sahib built by the Sixth Guru totally destroyed,women raped,men and kids shot dead and the Sikh reference library burned to ashes?

He claims he feels sorry for the people who lost their lives alongside the lives of 'militants' but he thinks his orders were 'legitimate’ his face shows no remorse.Jaswinder asks him was it a price worth paying ? and he says he does not know.

This was a very positive part in the programme as Jaswinder directly grilled the man behind the terror about his actions and justifications for it due to such a good interview Brar's claims fell flat on their face ie: about no warning being given to pilgrims,the 'safety' of his army and his moral decisions and so on.Never have Sikhs seen any presenter stand up to Brar like this and due to her questions and replies Brar tripped up and had to resort to being sarcastic and edgy at times.

After this segment Jaswinder meets shop owners selling posters of Sant Bhindranwale and sees Sikh Youths wearing t shirts just as they do here in the UK of Sant Ji and speaks to an 18 year old who sees Sant Bhindranwale as a great Saint & Soldier.He clearly misunderstands the question of when asked is anyone attacking his faith and replies with 'it happens in schools'.This leads Jaswinder to think things have changed a great deal and this is what most think when they go to the Panjab ,but one has to understand it is only recently that support for Sikh Freedom and Human Rights has returned after Panjab was put through a genocide lasting 10 years from rapes to false Police enconters.Even now people don't like to talk about 84 due to them being in fear.Not much has changed since the 1978 massacre of Vaisakhi in Amritsar by the Nirankaris as we saw on December 5th 2009 when Sikhs were shot dead in Ludhiana over the exact same issue of a Government supported cult 'Ashutosh DJJS' insulting Sikh tenents and in 2007 when Sacha Sauda another cult did the same.Not to mention the same issues of river water being diverted and other Sikh rights which were in the Anandpur Sahib resolution.


The story then goes on to Beant Singh visiting Amritsar and seeing the devastation himself and then on to the elimination of Indira Gandhi.The story of the Delhi Genocide then begins a very positive part of the programme such as the interview with Bibi Mohinder Kaur and her tragic story about her husband Gurmej Singh who was burned alive by Hindu mobs at a Delhi train station.It reveals the horrors of how Sikhs were hunted down and burned alive and raped,and how people such as Ashok Vahi helped Sikhs and photographed the Genocide of Sikhs being attacked and burned which made it to front pages.The story then moves on to a local Gurdwara in which Jaswinder is shown a painting of Sikhs being burned alive and attacked and raped,a reference is made to the Police and state being involved in the pre planned Genocide and about how Gurdwareh were burned and Sikhs burned alive.Although the reference is brief we understand that this section was about the victims and not the culprits such as the Congress leaders alongside Hindu fanatical groups and Government forces.

The Widow colony in Delhi is than shown in which widows describe how their kids and husbands were killed in front of their eyes as they stood helpless.Jaswinder is emotionally moved to tears as she hears about their stories and rightly so with the amount of horror and ethnic cleansing of all males that took place alongside the rape of Sikh girls and women.

Harvinder Singh Phoolka a well known lawyer and Human rights activist is then shown planting trees and asks Jaswinder to plant one as well she dedicates it to all the victims and Gurmej Singh husband of Bibi Mohinder Kaur who she met earlier.Jaswinder then reflects on her experiences while walking amongst the trees planted in memory of those who were killed in the Genocide.It then moves on to how India is more integrated - something which we do not agree with all one has to do is hear about the Genocide on Christians last year and the one before that on Muslims in 2002,Manmohan Singh told Sikhs a while back to forget 1984 which caused outrage and in the early 1990's denied any human rights abuses of Sikhs in the UN even though there was hardcore evidence to say so.Sikhs see Manmohan Singh as a puppet who has been put up to appease the Sikhs he has done nothing for Panjab or the Sikhs as most Sikhs in Panjab as well as abroad would agree.Our Gurdwareh may not be being destroyed but the silent terror and 'undercover attacks' just like in 1978 leading to 1984 remain as ever as we saw on December 5th 2009 and before that Panjab is in the same situation with the same problems as it was after 1978.

Jaswinder then goes back to the UK and meets Inderjit Singh (Network of Sikh Organisations) and Ravinder Kaur who practices Gatka and they discuss how 1984 has helped Sikhs rediscover their roots and heritage.We fully agree with this only last year around 30,000 Sikhs with the majority of them born here before and after 1984 took part in the biggest Sikh Justice and Freedom rally since 1984, one has only to go to their local Gurdwara and will see people wearing t shirts of Never Forget 1984 and jackets with pictures of Shaheed Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale,the awareness of 1984 is growing here and in Panjab at a rapid rate and the youth and indeed the entire Sikh nation are realising the truth of what happened in 1984.


While the programme had very positive parts after the segment on Bluestar it failed to mention the
*Nirankari 1978 massacre which led to the rise of Sant Bhindranwale.
*What Sant Bhindranwale and the Sikhs' demands were such as the Anandpur Sahib resolution.
*Econimic,Social,Political and religious rights being crushed.
*Insults to Sikhs and denial of religious freedom ie:Sikhs classed as Hindus in the constitution.
*Plight of Panjab and its people ie:Water being diverted illegally and so on
*Mass human rights abuses of Sikhs pre 1984 and during Bluestar.

These are just a few reasons of why there was Sikh unrest and we believe the researchers should have included these but none were instead Sant Bhindranwale and the Sikhs ,thanks to Mark Tully and the blunders of the researchers were made to look like fanatical terrorists who were out of control roaming around with guns.

No mention was made that when Bluestar was happening Sikhs trying to get to Amritsar were gunned down by helicopter gunships nor was any reference given to the Sikh reference library being burned or the human rights abuses within the Golden Temple Complex.Some of the facts should have been presented if not all as the programme was an hour only,we hold people such as Mark Tully and the research team responsible and not Jaswinder Kaur ,just because she presented the programme and it was her journey she only relayed back what she was told just like most Sikhs do on the issue of 1984,the truth is there we just have to expose it or people will follow the government version of lies.

It is up to us as the Sikh Nation not just in the UK but the across the World to educate everyone about what really happened and counter the likes of General Brar who fell flat on his face when questioned and grilled by Jaswinder on Operation Bluestar we praise Jaswinder on this for her courage in facing a man who shows no remorse or morality for his actions in 1984.We also thank her for showing the plight of Sikhs after the Delhi and Nationwide Genocide of Sikhs in November 1984.

Once again we would like to openly state to anyone attacking Jaswinder Kaur for the inaccurate portrayal by the researchers and Mark Tully of
Shaheed Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale.That we fully support her and DO NOT HOLD HER RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM for this negative part of the programme she has proved herself as a Sikh by going on this journey and we will not sit back and tolerate abuse towards her by anyone or any group and will come to her defence.

It is our Sikh Nation which needs to expose the truth and Jaswinder has tried her best to do this even though she was given inaccurate information - we have to understand she is not an expert on the issue - the same as most Sikhs,so we ask all of you to unite under one Nishan Sahib to educate fellow Sikhs on the truth about 1984 and what happened.

We thank Jaswinder Kaur for going on this journey and greatly appreciate her efforts,thanks to her more people Sikh and Non Sikh now want to know what happened in 1984 and why?

We would also like to state that Dal Khalsa UK will honour Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu - Sonia Deol for her work and courage she has shown on the issue of 1984.



Dal Khalsa UK

Never Forget 1984



Saturday, 9 January 2010

The RSS: The Force Behind Nanakshahi Change

The RSS: The Force Behind Nanakshahi Change
WSN Bureau

It was Sardar Patel of the Congress who had written that “I am thoroughly convinced that the RSS men can carry on their patriotic endeavour only by joining the Congress and not by keeping separate or opposing.” It is Prakash Singh Badal who has written that "I have always maintained that the SAD-BJP alliance in Punjab and at the Centre is more than a political arrangement. It represents the social and emotional harmony of Punjab.” At a time when Akal Takht has already declared RSS as the Enemy Number One of the Sikh Nation, with what face does Prakash Singh Badal have an alliance with the RSS-BJP? Clearly, the deeply entrenched RSS-backed forces have succeeded in depriving the Quom of its distinctive Nanakshahi Calendar.

Sardar Parkash Singh Badal is very proud of his relationship with the BJP. It is something he defines as more than a political alliance. His favorite phrase for this is "brotherly alliance": "Bharawan Di Saanjh". He has never written a single article about Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, or a single lament about Operation Bluestar. He never picked up a pen to write about denial of justice to victims of the 1984 genocide of the Sikhs, but as the World Sikh News brought out in its last edition, he has written an article in praise of a man who takes pride in being a lifelong member of the RSS -- AB Vajpayee.

As per Badal, “If I have to pick one national leader as the ultimate embodiment of the widest political consensus in the country, it will have to be Atalji.”

Since Prakash Singh Badal's Akali Dal has a brute majority in the SGPC and has ensured earlier this week that the Sikh Nation buckles before the demands being orchestrated by deep RSS lobbies within the panthic ranks and has changed the Nanakshahi Calendar, it is the best time to engage with how the RSS past has been, and how such an organization managed to stay lawful and accepted in India despite leading an explicitly hatred-filled agenda.

Twice in India the RSS was banned. Once, on February 4, 1948, after the murder of Mahatma Gandhi, and second time during the Emergency on July 4, 1975.

Here is what the government communique of February 4, 1948, announcing the ban, said:

“The professed aims and objects of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh are to promote the physical, intellectual and moral well-being of the Hindus and also to foster feelings of the brotherhood, love and service amongst them. Government themselves are most anxious to approve the general material and intellectual well-being of all sections of the people and have got schemes on hand which are designed to carry out the objects, particularly the provision of physical training and education in military matters to the youth of the country. Government have, however, noticed with regret that in practice members of Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh have not adhered to their professed ideals.

“Undesirable and even dangerous activities have been carried on by the members of the Sangh. It has been found that in several parts of the country individual members of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh have indulged in acts of violence involving arson, robbery, dacoity and murder and have collected illicit arms and ammunitions. They have been found circulating leaflets, exhorting people to resort to terrorist methods, to collect firearms, to create disaffection against the government and suborn the police and military.”

Read vintage Golwalker, the then chief of the RSS: “I tried my utmost to see that between the Congress, which is capable of delivering goods in the political field and is at present the ruling party, and the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh in the cultural field, …there be no bad blood, there be only everlasting mutual love, one supplementing and complementing the other, both meeting in a sacred confluence.” Of course today they meet in a “confluence”, sacred or not, and also joining this confluence is the Akali Dal of Badals.

Golwalkar claimed that the RSS was law-abiding and would “carry on its activities within the bounds of law”. He was arrested on February 1 and was released on August 6, 1948, but his movements were restricted to Nagpur. Five days later he wrote to Nehru and Patel complaining against the restrictions.

On September 27, A.V. Pai replied from the Prime Minister’s Secretariat that “Government have a great deal of evidence in their possession to show that the RSS were engaged in activities which were anti-national and prejudicial from the point of view of public good. Just before the banning of the RSS he (Mr. Nehru) is informed that the U.P. government sent you a note on some of the evidence they have collected about such activities of the RSS in U.P. Other provinces have also such evidence in their possession. Even after the ban we have received information about the undesirable activities of the old members of the RSS. This information continues to come to us even now. You will appreciate that in view of this, the government cannot consider the RSS as such a harmless organisation from the public point of view.”

Golwalkar demanded (November 3) an inquiry. By now the restriction had been lifted for the sole purpose of permitting him to visit Delhi and lay his case before the government. However, his request for an interview with Nehru was refused. While declining the interview, Nehru (November 10) made a telling point: “It would appear that the declared objectives have little to do with the real ones and with the activities carried on in various forms and ways by people associated with the RSS. These real objectives appear to be completely opposed to the decisions of the Indian Parliament and the provisions of the proposed Constitution, anti-national and often subversive and violent.”

Mark the words. "Declared objectives have little to do with the real ones". Which part of it is not true today? The BJP's newly appointed president Nitin Gadkari has taken upon himself to defend Narendra Modi. He is going all out to project Modi, under whose watch the killings of the Muslims in Gujarat took place, as the Vikas Purash of India. It is with such a party that Prakash Singh Badal is proud of his association.

Even after the ban, Patel was keen to absorb the RSS within the Congress. Yet, he was not too forthcoming when his Hindu Mahasabhaite colleague in the Cabinet, Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, began pestering him to be soft on the RSS and the Mahasabha. Patel wrote to Mookerjee on July 18 that “our reports do confirm that, as a result of the activities of these two bodies, particularly the former (the RSS), an atmosphere was created in the country in which such a ghastly tragedy (Gandhi’s assassination) became possible. There is no doubt in my mind that the extreme section of the Hindu Mahasabha was involved in this conspiracy. The activities of the RSS constituted a clear threat to the existence of government and the state. Our reports show that those activities, despite the ban, have not died down. Indeed, as time has marched on, the RSS circles are becoming more defiant and are indulging in their subversive activities in an increasing measure.”

Clearly, this was the compromise between the Congress and the RSS. Both catered to the radicalised, communal Hindu sentiments and did not want to lose this important chunk of Indian electorate. With Congress assuming a left of Centre position and leaving the right of centre to the RSS-Janasangh or the modern day BJP, the entire Hindutva flank can be covered. It is his cooperation, collusion and teaming up with such a flank that Prakash Singh Badal is so proud of.

That there is a deeply entrenched soft Hindutva forever etched inside the Congress is clear from Patel’s reply to Golwalkar less than two months later, on September 11.

Addressing him as “Brother Golwalkar” (the latter’s letter was addressed to “Hon’ble Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel”), the Sardar recalled his speech at Jaipur in December 1947 in which he had spoken very gently of the RSS (“patriots who love their country”). He regretted that this had no effect on the Sangh: “There can be no doubt that the RSS did service to the Hindu Society.... But the objectionable part arose when they, burning with revenge, began attacking Musalmans. Organising the Hindus and helping them is one thing, but going in for revenge for its sufferings on innocent and helpless men, women and children is quite another thing.” He added: “All their speeches were full of communal poison.” Patel reminded Golwalkar that RSS men expressed joy and distributed sweets after Gandhi’s death. He squarely charged that “as a final result of the poison the country had to suffer the sacrifice of the invaluable life of Gandhi”.

But the Sardar, nonetheless, made a strange proposal for reasons of his own: “I am thoroughly convinced that the RSS men can carry on their patriotic endeavour only by joining the Congress and not by keeping separate or opposing.” He had the restriction lifted and Golwalkar came to Delhi.

Prakash Singh Badal finds it easy to look for an enemy in the Congress and a friend in the RSS-BJP. Why he cannot see what is visible to even the political novices is beyond any understanding unless Badal is being a hypocrite. Clearly, he is being one.

When the talks did not succeed, on November 2, 1948, Golwalkar announced the failure in public statements outlining his stand. Three days later he replied to Sardar Patel’s proposal in terms which are very significant. They were the basis on which he later supported the creation of the Jan Sangh, the ancestor of the BJP: “I tried my utmost to see that between the Congress, which is capable of delivering goods in the political field and is at present the ruling party, and the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh in the cultural field, which has achieved success in creating a matchless spirit of patriotism, brotherhood and selflessness among the people, there be no bad blood, there be only everlasting mutual love, one supplementing and complementing the other, both meeting in a sacred confluence.”

So, even though the talks had failed and Golwalkar was ordered to go back to Nagpur, the intentions have come on record for the posterity. The Congress till date has been delivering goods in the political field and the RSS has been polluting the cultural field. The recent changes effected in the Nanakshahi Calendar are the latest proof of this cultural pollution.

This what PM Nehru’s office wrote to the RSS chief: “Government have a great deal of evidence in their possession to show that the RSS were engaged in activities which were anti-national and prejudicial from the point of view of public good.”

Here is the Indian Home Ministry's statement of November 14, 1948 recording what had transpired in Golwalkar’s two interviews with Sardar Patel and the former’s refusal to alter the Sangh’s ways: “The information received by the Government of India shows that the activities carried on in various forms and ways by the people associated with the RSS tend to be antinational and often subversive and violent and that persistent attempts are being made by the RSS to revive an atmosphere in the country which was productive of such disastrous consequences in the past.” It added: “He has written letters both to the Prime Minister and Home Minister explaining inter alia that the RSS agrees entirely with the conception of a secular state for India and that it accepts the National Flag of the country and requesting that the ban imposed on the organisation in February should now be lifted. These professions of the RSS leader are, however, quite inconsistent with the practice of his followers and for the reason already explained above, the Government of India find themselves unable to advise Provincial Governments to lift the ban.”

The government issued a communique on July 11, 1949, announcing the lifting of the ban. It recorded the RSS leader’s clarifications and said: “In the light of the modifications made and clarifications given by the RSS leader, the Government of India have come to the conclusion that the RSS organisation should be given an opportunity to function as a democratic, cultural organisation owing loyalty to the Indian Constitution and recognising the National Flag eschewing secrecy and abjuring violence.”

Clearly, this was the compromise between the Congress and the RSS. Both catered to the radicalised, communal Hindu sentiments and did not want to lose this important chunk of Indian electorate. With Congress assuming a left of Centre position and leaving the right of centre to the RSS-Janasangh or the modern day BJP, the entire Hindutva flank can be covered.

It is his cooperation, collusion and teaming up with such a flank that Prakash Singh Badal is so proud of. Badal's words as a study in obsequousness:

"After the elections, a BJP-led government was to be formed at the Centre with Mr Vajpayee as Prime Minister. They were looking for allies. I realized that this was a crucial and even a historic moment to undo the feelings of mutual suspicion. The Shiromani Akali Dal had swept the polls in Punjab. We went over to Mr Vajpayee's residence and announced unconditional support to him. Vajpayeeji embraced me in front of a large gathering that had come to his residence to express solidarity with him. A picture of Vajpayeeji and me on Page 1 of a prominent national daily the next morning did more to bridge the emotional chasm that had been created between Hindus and Sikhs. It was an emotional moment... I can never adequately explain what our coming together has done for creating an atmosphere of mutual goodwill in Punjab."

If this was the Badals' turn for turning obsequous, they were only taking a leaf out of the RSS own book. When the RSS was banned for the second time, the letters that the then RSS chief Balasaheb Deoras had written to Indira Gandhi during the Emergency were cringing: “I have heard the speech you delivered on August 15, 1975, from the Red Fort, Delhi on AIR. The speech was balanced and befitting to the occasion and has prompted me to write this letter to you,” he wrote on August 22. He concluded: “I beseech you to rescind the ban imposed upon the RSS.” Deoras wrote to Indira Gandhi again on July 16, praising her foreign policy and renewing his plea on the ban. Both letters were ignored.

Deoras’ letters to S.B. Chavan were as abject. He wrote on June 6, 1976, asking Chavan for “release on parole with a view to clarifying certain issues directly to you”. The entreaty was repeated on July 12, 1976. None of the letters elicited a reply.

When the Emergency was over, and the RSS prospered during the Janata era, Prakash Singh Badal was among the key politicians that lent credibility to the Janasangh. When the Janasangh walked out of the Janata Party to form the Bharatiya Janata Party, Prakash Singh Badal did not lose a single opportunity to underline his close links with LK Advani or AB Vajpayee.

When the Akal Takht in recent past declared the RSS to be the Enemy Number One of the Sikh Nation, Prakash Singh Badal did his level best to get the hukumnama deferred or withdrawn. So far he has only succeeded in not letting this Hukumnama come to the forefront.

Now when the Justice Liberhan Commission also says that the BJP and the RSS are but one, and that there was no way the BJP can go out of the command and control structure of the RSS, one thing is very clear: Punjab's ruling Akali Dal of Parkash Singh Badal-Sukhbir Singh Badal has an alliance with a party that is an appendage of the RSS, described by the Akal Takht as Enemy Number One of the Sikhs.

So what is Akali Dal? Enemy Number Two of the Sikhs?

No wonder Mr Badal has written: "If I have to pick one national leader as the ultimate embodiment of the widest political consensus in the country, it will have to be Atalji." Whatever happened to a social construct called "Shame"?

RSS: The Agent Provocateur

RSS has been raising provocative issues every now and then, keeping up the pressure on India's minorities and sending signals that unless they agree tolive in a subdued manner with second class citizen status, there will be trouble.

Not so long ago, its leader K.S. Sudarshan said minority status for Muslims and Christians in India should be scrapped. "Ninety-nine per cent of Muslims and Christians in this country were born here. So why do they call themselves minorities?" he asked.

Every now and then, the right-wing umbrella saffron body of Rashtriya Swamsewak Sangh (RSS) considers it prudent to mention that the Sikhs are a part of the larger Hindu samaj.

Last year, the RSS had said it was putting to rest earlier controversies by redefining its stand on the Sikh faith, but merely reiterated that Sikhism is a separate religion but part of the larger Hindu samaj. The statement only complicated matters further with the Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) adopting a hard stance and objecting to this view, but not moving an inch to counter it.

“We regard the Sikh religion as a separate religion, but we regard the Sikh people as belonging to our samaj.When we say that they are a part of the one great Hindu samaj, we do not deny the existence of their separate religion and separate beliefs.The Hindu samaj is a commonwealth of many religions,” the RSS official website stated.

It also said that the RSS held the belief that the Hindu Code Bill is applicable to Sikhs, Jains and Buddhista alike and it should be applicable to others like Christians and Muslims too.

Sikhs have often reacted sharply and have asserted that they have their own separate identity and are not a part of the Hindu samaj. The Sikhs have also been demanding that they should not be covered under the Hindu Marriage Act and that the government should implement the Anand Marriage Act while accepting Sikhs as a separate Nation.

In what may not be to the liking ot the Akalis, allies of the BJP, the Sangh has also expressed the view that it sees a “problem” of minorities assume a political character.

“The majority-minority distinctions must be restricted to the bases on which the minority character is sought to be claimed ... The problem arises when a particular minority transgresses the basis of its minority character and assumes a political one,”it said.

Voices against the RSS have often emerged from among the Diaspora too. At a human rights conference in Southall last October, a number of communities came together as a front against Hindutva terrorism backed by organisations like the RSS in India. Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh community leaders included Lord Nazir Ahmed, Avtar Singh Sanghra(Babbar), Tarsem singh (British Sikh council), Gurcharan Singh (Dal Khalsa), Manmohan Singh Khalsa (World Muslim Sikh Federation), Nazar Lodhi (World Muslim Sikh Federation), Sonil (Buddhist community India), Dr Mokel Hazaraka (Assam watch) Hindu community leader, Amdad Husain (Star News) and Adran Chada (British Muslim Youth Federation UK).

All the leaders collectively wanted a ban on the RSS and said there was certainly no place for such an organisation in the UK which stood for human rights and tolerance for all communities.

In the light of the increased activities of the RSS in the United Kingdom in gathering funds, political backing and spreading their hate ideology, the World Muslim Sikh Federation even petitioned Prime Minister Gordon Brown to ban the group, freeze its assets and its funding.

The RSS influences the policies of every single political party in India, be it the Congress, BJP and so on. The RSS has recently increased its activities within the UK against Sikhs and other groups, such as Muslims. By creating tension between Sikhs and Muslims for no apparent reason, they have also tried to divide these two communities from within by causing internal conflict.

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

Dal Khalsa UK Honours Shaheed Satwant Singh & Shaheed Kehar Singh

Dal Khalsa honours Shaheed Bhai Satwant Singh who eliminated Indira Gandhi alongside Shaheed Bhai Beant Singh - He was hanged on this day 21 yrs ago alongside Shaheed Bhai Kehar Singh

We remember & honour Shaheed Bhai Satwant Singh & Shaheed Bhai Keher Singh who were hanged today by India 21 yrs ago, January 6th 1989.Shaheed Satwant Singh Shot dead Indira Gandhi the wicked Brahmin Witch on 31st October 1984 in Revenge for her attack on the Sikh Nation & her terrorist assaults on our Shrines.










Monday, 4 January 2010

Maharaja Jassa Singh Ramgarhia




Ramgarhia was born Jassa Singh Thoka at Ichogil village in 1723, near the city of Amritsar into a sudar family. His grandfather, Baba Hardas Singh was a resident of Sur Singh, a large village in the Lahore district. He was the first sikh in the family,baba jee was feed up hindu caste system and its social and reliogious structure.he converted to sikhism took amrit (the Sikh baptismal oath) from the hands of Guru Gobind Singh, the initiator of the Pahul tradition who bestowed the original Panj Piares. Giving up his work as a ploughman, he became one of the Guru's personal attendants.he learnt about sikhi from tenth master.he learnt about religion and polotics from Guru Gobind Singh.


Baba je took major leassons from tow main events in sikh histroy,which took place in his life time.first one was the shaheede of guru gobind singh jee and sons.in paticular the Mata Gujri ji and his two younger sons, Sahibzada Zorawar Singh and Sahibzada Fateh Singh shaeede.

When Satguru Gobind Singh Ji left Sri Anandpur Sahib in 1704, Gangu took the lost Mata Gujar Kaur, alias Mata Gujri Ji, and two younger sons, to his village of Kherhi. After offering them shelter (as Hindus say , a guest is to be treated like a God) he went to the athorities, his three guests were arrested, and he was given a reward from the Governor of Sirhind.


This is the true explanation about Gangu who proved himself unworthy of the trust the Guru's family had placed in him not only as the families cook, but in their most urgent time of need. His treachery sealed the fate of the Guru's mother and the two youngest Lions, the Sahibzadis; the youngest Shaheedan who held firm to their fate, freely chosing death rather than bending to the swords of tryanny. In a twist of fate Gangu may have been an ancestor of the family of Kashmiri Pandits who changed their name to reflect their receicving a gift of a jagir which included a canal, for which the family name was changed, as the 'Nehru' family records say.


Secondly the creation of the Khalsa caused created a sense of unity among the Sikhs and their supporters. This unity and the resulting perceived strength in the Sikhs did not go well with the local rulers. The continuous gatherings at Anandpur sahib and the presence of many thousands of the congregation, some armed with fierce weapons caused anguish with the surrounding hill Rajas. These developments most alarmed the caste ridden Rajput chiefs of the Sivalik hills. They perceived the Sikhs as lower caste beings who had posed no danger to their authority. However, the creation of the Khalsa changed that. Firstly, it disturbed their system of discrimination and division; secondly, they could see that the forces of the Guru were becoming dangerous in number and in armaments.

They hence rallied under the leadership of the Raja of Bilaspur, in whose territory lay Anandpur, to forcibly evict Guru Gobind Singh from his hilly citadel. Their repeated expeditions during 1700-04 however proved abortive. The Khalsa forces were too strong to be dealt with by the hill Rajas. They at last petitioned Emperor Aurangzeb for help. In concert with contingents sent under imperial orders by the governor of Lahore and those of the faujdar of Sirhind, they marched upon Anandpur and laid a siege to the fort in May 1705.These were sons of the same hill raja guru je freed from prison .Guru Hargobind Ji, who was freed from imprisonment and also managed to release 52 Hindu Kings (political prisoners) at the same time from the famous fort of Gwalior by making clever use of Emperor Jahangir's orders to allow any who could hold on to the Gurus coat tails to leave the fort with the Guru (October, 1619).


Baba hardas singh ji learnt a great lesson from these two events.he learnt about the hearted that bramins towards sikhism and belived them to be bigest threat to sikhism.he taught this lesson to his jatha which later became misel ramgharia,which was one main reason fro the oppositionmisel ramgharia by other misels.


In 1716 his grandfather, Hardas Singh died in a skirmish. His son, Bhagwan Singh then became the head of the family, and with two hundred followers entered the Imperial Mughal forces under the Governor of Lahore—Khan Bahadur. Where owing to his abilities he became a distinguished officer. During Nadir Shah invasion of in 1739 he died in a battle near Lahore. Khan Bahadur surrendered to the Persian invader's forces and was left in place as Governor.Bhagwan Singh had five sons, Jai Singh, Jassa Singh, Khushal Singh, Mali Singh and Tara Singh. Jassa Singh, the eldest, now became the head of the family. He was appointed a Risaldar by Khan Bahadur. He and his brothers were given the following five villages (one village to each brother): Valla went to Jassa Singh, his four brothers were given Verka, Sultanwind, Tung and Chabba. All of these are now in the Amritsar district. On the death of Khan Bahadur in 1746, Jassa Singh, together with his followers, joined his Sikh brethren at Amritsar.


The Ramgarhia Misl
In 1716 Ahmed Shah Durrane left Lahore, Adina Beg the Afghan Governor of Punjab was hunting for the heads of the sikhs, they dispersed and scattered in all directions. Jassa Singh and others in the band took refuge in the mud fort of Ram Rauni near Amritsar where they were surrounded and attacked during the ensuing period. In 1758 Adina Beg died and there was a power vacuum in Punjab and those who escaped from fort of Ram Rauni assumed the name of Ramgarhias and Jassa Singh became its head.The Misal ( Confederacy) was called Ramgarhia .
The main concentration of the Misl was in and around the Riarki area of Amritsar, Gurdaspur and Batala (in Majha). Ramgarhia constructed and fortified the mud fortress of Ram Rauni just outside Amritsar. It was named in honour of the founder of the city, the fourth Sikh Guru, Guru Ram Das. His Misl contained more than 10000 cavalry who were always on the move, helping the Dal Khalsa whenever the Mughals or Afghans attacked. Whilst the Mughal administration controlled the cities, it were the Sikhs who were in control of the villages. Twenty years earlier, Banda Bahadur had wreaked havoc on the Mughal administration by abolishing all taxes and the Zamindari system. Now only a "dasvand" (10% of income)was levied on the Sikhs - as protection tax to pay for the armies. Maharaja sr.jassa singh ramgarhia was 1st sikh maharaja and Hargobindpur was his capial.

Mir Mannu becomes the new Subedar of the Punjab
Mir Mannu became the new governor of the Punjab on April 9, 1748. He appointed Kaura Mal as his new Diwan (minister). After taking control of the administration of the provinces, he employed his army to fight the Sikh misls or fighting orders. The Sikhs left the territory and moved to other states. The Sikh Chiefs asked Jassa Singh Ramgarhia to liaise with the subedar(governor) of the Jullundur Doab, Adina Beg Khan. While drawing his salary from Mughals, Adina Beg Khan joined forces with the Jassa Singh Ramgarhia against the Mughals.

The siege of Ram Rauni

The Sikhs gathered in Amritsar on Diwali,1748. Adina Beg proceeded towards Amritsar and besieged Ram Rauni. Mir Mannu came down from Lahore with an army to assist Beg in the siege.Jassa Singh used the good offices of Diwan Kaura Mal and had the siege lifted. The fort was strengthened and re-named Ramgarh. Jassa Singh, having been designated the Jathedar of the fort, became popular as Ramgarhia.

Fighting tyranny


Mannu intensified his violence and oppression against the Sikhs. There were only 900 Sikhs when he surrounded the Ramgarh fort again. The Sikhs fought their way out bravely. The army demolished the fort. The hunt for and torture of the Sikhs continued until Mannu died in 1753.
Manu’s death left Punjab without any effective Governor. It was again an opportune period for the Sikhs to organize themselves and gain strength. Jassa Singh rebuilt the fort and took possession of some areas around Amritsar. The Sikhs took upon themselves the task of protecting the people in the villages from the invaders. The money they obtained from the people was called Rakhi (protection charges).
The new Governor, Prince Timur, the son of Ahmed Shah Abdali, despised the Sikhs. In 1757, he again forced the Sikhs to vacate the fort and move to their hiding places. The fort was demolished, the Harimandir was blown up, and the sacred pool was filled with debris. The Governor decided to replace Adina Beg. Beg asked the Sikhs for help and they both got a chance to weaken their common enemy. Adina Beg won the battle. The Sikhs rebuilt Ramgarh and repaired the Harimandir. Beg was well acquainted with the strength of the Sikhs and he feared they would oust him if he allowed them to grow stronger, so he lead a strong army to demolish the fort. After fighting valiantly, the Sikhs decided to leave the fort. Beg died in 1758.


The Ramgarhia Misl Estate


Jassa Singh Ramgarhia occupied the area to the north of Amritsar between the Ravi and the Beas rivers. He also added the Jalandhar region and Kangra hill areas to his estate. He had his capital in Sri Hargobindpur. The large size of Jassa Singh’s territory aroused the jealousy of the other Sikh Misls.
Intra Misl wars
Baba hardas singh ji grandfather of jassa singh jee taught his jatha which later became misel ramgharia,that braminism was the biggest threat to sikhism.which was one main reason fro the opposition misel ramgharia by other misels.

But ramgharia jee had no hate his sikhs brother which was seen when, Ahluwalia while hunting one day, happened to enter Ramgarhia territory where Jassa Singh’s brother arrested him. Jassa Singh apologized for the misbehavior of his brother, and honorably returned Ahluwalia with gifts. However, their old differences increased further. The other chiefs also took a grim view of this act.
Due to mutual jealousies, fights continued among the Sikh Sardars. In 1776, the Bhangis changed sides and joined Jai Singh to defeat Jassa Singh. His capital at Sri Hargobindpur was taken over and he and his forces were pursued from village to village. Finally he lost all his territory. He choose to cross the river Satluj, going over to Amar Singh, the ruler of Patiala.


Amar Singh welcomed the Ramgarhia sardar in order to make use of his bravery, fighting skill, and ruling experience. He gave him the areas of Hansi and Hissar which Jassa Singh handed over to his son. He himself joined Amar Singh to take control of the villages on the west and north of Delhi, now forming parts of Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. Jassa Singh Ramgarhia entered Delhi in 1783. Shah Alam II, the Mughal emperor, extended him a warm welcome. Ramgarhia left Delhi after receiving gifts from him.


Meanwhile to the north, differences over how to divide the Jammu state revenues, resulted in long time friends and neighbours Maha Singh, Jathedar of the Sukerchakia Misl and Jai Singh, Jathedar of the Kanahya Misl, becoming enemies. This rancor resulted in a war which would change the course of Sikh history.Maha Singh requested Jassa Singh Ramgarhia's aid. In the ensuing battle, Jai Singh Kanahya lost his son, Gurbaksh Singh in the fighting with the Sukerchakias and the Ramgarhias.


The unification of the Misls
Sada Kaur, the newly widowed wife of Gurbaksh Singh, proved to be a great statesperson. Seeing the end of Khalsa power if such internescine battles continued, she now worked to unite the waring misls in order to form a united, formidablé force. She was able to convince Maha Singh to adopt the path of friendship by offering the hand of her daughter, then only a child, to his son, himself just a young boy, Ranjit Singh the future Maharaja of the Punjab. The balance of power now shifted in favor of this united Misl as other sardars also joined the union. Ranjit Singh was now the leader of the most powerful Sikh Misl ever.

Establishment of the Sikh Kingdom of the Punjab

When the Afghan invader, Shah Zaman, came in 1788, the Sikhs, however, were still divided. The Ramgarhia and Bhangi Misls were not willing to help Ranjit Singh because of his links with hindu hill kings,bangis and ram gharia wanted to punish the hill kings from role attack of guru gobind singh. Ranjit Singh refused to listen to them and occupied Lahore in 1799 but the Ramgarhias and Bhangis did not accept him as the leader of all the Sikhs. They got the support of their friends and marched to Lahore to challenge Ranjit Singh. The forces, who were 12 miles outside the city, were finalizing their plans to attack, when the Bhangi leader died. This discouraged Jassa Singh and he returned to his territory.he was a best sikh ever

Death of Maharaja Jassa Singh Ramgarhia was eighty years old when he died in 1803. His son, Sr. Jodh Singh Ramgarhia, developed good relations with Ranjit Singh and they never fought again,and lost the sikh raj to the hindu hill kings.

Sunday, 3 January 2010

Dal Khalsa Opposes any move to Modify/Withdraw Nanakshahi Calender‏

Dal Khalsa opposes all moves by the Sant Samaj and others to change or withdraw the Sikh Calender which has become an icon of victory in the face of Hindu fanatic attacks on Sikhism,be they ideological or military assaults on our places of worship or genocide on the nation.Nanakshahi stands for the seperate unique identity of the Sikh Nation worldover.

At this point it does seem that the SPGC and Akal Takht Jathedar have given in to pressure from demands by the Sant Samaj - and hidden Hindu forces - RSS & the sangh parivar to actually turn the Nanakshahi back in to the Vikrami Calender.A Calendar which is scientifically proven to be accurate using the Solar Tropical year system and not the lunar and a Calendar which is inline with Gurbani is today being torn apart by our very own so called leaders.

The Akal Takht Jathedar and his fellow Jathedars should hang their heads in shame along with the SGPC for giving in to the demands of the Anti Nanakshahi lobby the Sant Samaj and Hindu Forces.

It seems ridiculous that the Sikhs are going 10 steps back rather than forward and are reverting to a calender which is inaccurate and works accorind to the lunar cycle and that of Sun Worship and other hocus pocus which Sikhi rejects

We call on all Sikhs in the Panjab to stand united against this dangerous move to destablise the Sikh Qoum.

The Dal Khalsa, Akhand Kirtani Jatha, DSGMC, Shiromani Khalsa Panchayat, Shiromani Akali Dal (Panch Pardhani), Sikh Students Federation, Sikh Youth of Punjab, Akal Federation, Shiromani Panthic Council in a joint statement said the calendar was a valuable asset of the community and no one has a right or monopoly to amend or alter it.

Significantly, Pakistan Sikh Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, American Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, Sikh Youth of America, Sikh Federation of Germany, Switzerland, Australia & Canada, Dasmesh Darbar Surrey, Voices for Freedom, Khalistan Affairs Centre too have voiced their concern against the proposed changes.



VIDEO FROM NEW YORK OPPOSING ANY CHANGES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDMVw8BL2mo


The Dal Khalsa questions the rationale and motive behind the proposed changes in the Nanakshahi calendar by the SGPC and Sant Samaj.

In a statement party president H S Dhami rued that the SGPC was going to kill the letter and spirit of the Nanakshahi Calendar in its executive meet scheduled for Sunday.

“I believe that the present house of the SGPC has completed its five year tenure and being in extension mode it cannot take policy decisions”.

Describing the SGPC head as spineless person, he condemned the SGPC and the SAD leadership for pushing the Sikhs into a Brahmanical fold by mixing the Nanakshahi calendar with Bikrami calendar”.

Issuing stern warning to Jathedar Avtar Singh, the leader of the radical group said his name (SGPC chief) would be recorded as a "culprit" of the community in the contemporary Sikh history.

Recalling the blunders of the SGPC, he said this was not the first time that the SGPC was taking a U-turn. The All India Gurdwara Bill, Heritage status for Darbar Sahib and so on met the same fate, he rued.

Blog Archive

Dal Khalsa UK's Facebook Page